B2B SaaS AEO, GEO & AI Search Services in Singapore

First we scope the monitoring together: target markets, buyer and developer profiles, the competitors to benchmark, and the shortlist questions to track — real best-tool, alternatives, and X vs Y phrasings. Those queries then run daily across all nine engines while the dashboard builds your baseline: who each engine recommends today, how it describes your product, and which sources it cites. Your first weekly report delivers the visibility baseline, the competitor comparison, and a prioritized list of source gaps, and we reconcile against it every week after.

There is no fixed timeline, because the mechanism sets the pace: engines first have to crawl new sources, then gradually trust them when assembling answers, and both steps depend on how contested your category is and what sources you already have. Qualified long-tail questions usually move first — phrasings that specify a deployment model, a compliance requirement, or a team size — while broad best-of head terms move last. We never promise a date; every query is logged daily on the dashboard, so what you see is a trend line, not a verbal assurance.

On three levels. Visibility rate: the share of your shortlist questions where an engine mentions you at all. Recommendation rate: the share where AI goes further and actually recommends you. Source citations: which pages the answers cite, and which of those we built. Each metric is broken down per engine and per query, benchmarked against competitors, and reconciled line by line in the weekly report — which queries moved, and on the strength of which sources.

That depends on your market map, but SaaS companies routinely underestimate their Chinese touchpoints: entering China means developers vetting your stack on DeepSeek and Qwen, existing Chinese customers mean procurement and IT running checks on Doubao and Tencent Yuanbao, and local resellers and integrators do their homework in Chinese engines too. None of these read G2 or Reddit — they cite Zhihu, CSDN, and WeChat-published articles, so your English reputation does not carry. At minimum, look at your Chinese-side baseline on the dashboard before deciding how much to invest.

Your team keeps doing what it does well; we close the loop on the engine side. The dashboard shows which queries are slipping and whom each engine cites, so your writers work against a real priority list, and we take over whatever you want managed — diagnosis, restructuring content for AI citation, and building authoritative third-party sources. Your existing blog, docs, and comparison pages are the raw material; the job is turning them into sources the nine engines cite, not standing up a rival content operation.

We do three things only — diagnosis, fact-based content, and authoritative source building — all grounded in verifiable information about your product: no poisoning, no fake volume, no fabricated reviews, no posing as users in communities. Developer communities are ruthless with astroturfing, and one exposed scheme hurts a brand more than never doing GEO at all, which is exactly why we stay white-hat. Every deliverable is traceable item by item in the weekly report, and our Base plus Bonus pricing — with the Bonus paid only after agreed KPIs are met — leaves us no incentive to cut corners.