EV & New Energy Vehicle AEO, GEO & AI Search Services in Singapore

Step one is translating your business into questions: we map the intent queries consumers, dealers and supply-chain partners actually put to AI, organized by product line — vehicle models, battery and powertrain, charging and storage — and by target market, then confirm the list with you and load it into the dashboard. The system starts running those queries daily across all nine engines, English and Chinese, recording where you and competitors appear and which sources get cited, and produces a baseline report: who gets recommended today, which reviews and articles AI leans on, and which generation of your specs it is quoting. That baseline is your first dataset and the reference point every weekly report reconciles against.

We do not promise a date, because the pace depends on how each engine recrawls and starts trusting new sources — and in a high-value, high-trust category like cars, engines adopt safety and reputation sources conservatively. Movement typically starts at the long tail: more accurate descriptions appear first in questions about a specific model, market or spec, then spread toward the core questions about what to buy at a given price. With daily tracking and a weekly report, you see every shift in the data as it happens rather than waiting for a vague all-clear. Our Base + Bonus billing also puts the timing risk on our side: the Bonus is only paid once the KPIs we agreed on are met.

Three layers on the dashboard: visibility — the share of consumer-side and B2B questions where the answer mentions you; recommendation rate — the share where AI actively places you on its shortlist rather than merely mentioning you; and source citations — which sources the engines drew on, drillable to the individual review or article. That last layer matters most here: a misquoted spec or an outdated safety record almost always traces back to a handful of fixed sources. The same metrics run for named competitors. The weekly report reconciles that week against the actions taken and what comes next — progress is verified in data, not asserted in calls.

Yes, and the reason has nothing to do with consumers. In an export vehicle programme, the overseas side is consumers and dealers, while the China side is investors, supply-chain partners, contract manufacturers, component suppliers and channel partners still deciding whether to work with you — and they verify your capacity, certifications, delivery record and how past incidents were handled on Doubao and DeepSeek. Chinese engines cite a separate source ecosystem — trade media, corporate-information platforms and industry discussion — that your English-language footprint barely reaches. When a partner finds a stale or negative version there, your negotiating terms get measurably worse. If your business genuinely has no China-side exposure, we can run English engines only and scope the plan to what you actually need.

We operate as managed execution, not extra workload for your team: diagnosis, content production and authority-source building are on us, and your side does two things — fact-checking (specs, range standards, trim and warranty terms stay accurate on your authority, since one wrong number is expensive in this industry) and opening up raw material (technical white papers, certification and crash-test reports, real-world test data and press reviews are the best inputs). The dashboard and weekly reports are open to marketing and PR: visibility and competitor data feed straight into campaign and content planning, while the citation layer tells PR exactly which old articles keep shaping how AI describes the brand and are worth addressing first.

We do exactly three things: diagnose, produce truthful content and build authoritative sources — no poisoning, no fake volume, no fabricated reviews, no manipulation of owner communities or review outlets, and no approaching media or posters to demand takedowns. Everything published is grounded in facts you have verified — real specs, real certifications, real test results — and clears your approval before release. On safety we are deliberately conservative: where a recall is complete or an incident's cause has been established, we publish the official conclusion and the third-party verifiable record so engines have a fuller version to cite; anything still under investigation we leave alone, and we never soften how it reads. Nothing in this playbook needs hiding from platform rules or regulators — in the auto industry, manipulating safety information is not merely a marketing problem.